HPV-The UK's Fascist Mask Slips.
- Details
- Category: Philip Jones - Writings
- Created: Thursday, 10 September 2009 17:43
- Written by Philip Jones
By Philip Jones 9th September 2009.
PARENTS in the UK are being threatened with having their children taken into care after questioning doctors’ diagnoses or objecting to their medical care. John Hemming, a Liberal Democrat MP, who campaigns to stop injustices in the family court, said: “Very often care proceedings are used as retaliation by local authorities against ‘uppity’ people who dare to question the system.”
Many such cases are now emerging across the UK:
Ashleigh Cave, from Liverpool (Above Picture), began experiencing severe headaches and dizziness half an hour after being inoculated last October with Cervarix, which supposedly guards against girls contracting the Human Papilloma Virus.
The schoolgirl was soon collapsing repeatedly; she lost the use of her legs and was admitted to Alder Hey children’s hospital. Nearly 11 months later she is still in hospital and is unable to stand or walk unaided. Her mother Cheryl, has now been told that doctors believe her condition must be `psychosomatic.`
“The hospital brought in social workers from the local authority who have told me they are considering putting Ashleigh on an at-risk register,” Cheryl Cave said.
She is convinced, and with good reason, that her daughter’s paralysis was caused by the vaccination. Mrs Cave said that a social worker from Sefton council said she suspected her of having Munchhausen’s syndrome by proxy or factitious illness syndrome — controversial conditions in which mothers are said to attribute illnesses falsely to their children in order to gain attention.
Mrs Cave said: “The social worker said I should stop believing the injection has anything to do with Ashleigh’s condition because I am putting my thoughts on to her and stopping her getting well. Since Ashleigh was in hospital she has become incontinent and had double kidney infections and chest infections. Have I made all these up?”
No Cheryl, you haven't made anything up.
This is just another example of the UK National Health Service's whorish slavery to the State/Big Pharma Corporate Axis, and illustrates the stranglehold that the modern Corporate State has on it’s people, and how completely `plugged in` to it’s `Matrix` most of those people are, particularly those who depend upon it for their livelihood. Many parents in the UK for example, under immense pressure from both central and local government and the social services have simply abdicated responsibility for their children. Handing them over `lock stock and barrel` to the State machine. Thankfully, Cheryl Cave isn't one of them.
The British Government is on record as stating that it intends to vaccinate as many young girls as is possible against the HPV virus which it, or rather the Pharmaceutical Giants, in whose salary it clearly is, say causes cervical cancer. Social networking sites have already been targeted in a bid to encourage girls to have the jab telling them that it helps protect against Human Papilloma Virus (HPV).
The Corporate/State assertion is that HPV is a sexually-transmitted infection that causes most cases of cervical cancer. Schools across the UK have been vaccinating pupils aged 12 and 13 (Year 8) for over a year now, with about 300,000 girls estimated to having already received the jab in England alone. By July 2011, it is estimated that more than two million girls will have been `offered` the vaccine, including those up to the age of 18 as part of a catch-up programme.
The Government's campaign for England, which was launched last year and continues unabated, has included online, press, TV and radio advertising. A series of `road shows` have been held in shopping centres across the country. The initial campaign ran this time last year, with follow-up advertising in February in order to remind girls not to miss their third and final injection. Girls aged 17 and 18, who form part of the catch-up programme, will be the target of a different advertising campaign this October.
The Propaganda lie goes something like this: "The HPV vaccine protects against over 70% of the strains that cause cervical cancer, which accounts for around 1,000 deaths a year in the UK."
This is nothing but Corporate/State/Media `hokum,` as the real experts in the field, who are in no doubt whatsoever about what the true purpose of this pernicious campaign is all about, have been trying so hard to get across to the public on both sides of the Atlantic.
The Facts.
Merck, the manufactures of the Gardasil vaccine insist that it protects against over 70% of the strains that cause Cervical Cancer. There are over 100 strains of HPV, only 30 of which are theoretically linked to Cervical Cancer. HPV is present naturally in at least half the population without ever causing any disease whatsoever. HPV has never been proved as a pathogen for any disease.
Merck originally claimed that, “ There was a strong connection between HPV and cervical cancer." Somewhere along the way, that became “is the cause of” without any medical evidence to support this claim. This is clearly more about sales and marketing than science.
Merck's Gardasil and its competition, Glaxo's `Cervarix,` are made up of virus like particles from four strains of HPV. With no clinical studies whatsoever, two of these `strains` are now being touted by both Merck and Glaxo, as being responsible for 70% of all cervical cancer cases. Both make the unproven claim, that HPV causes squamous cell cervical cancer.
The question which demands answering is why the market demographic Merck chose, was pre -teen 12 year old girls, when the average age of women who contract cervical cancer is 50 years plus, so why target 12 year olds? And even Merck themselves openly state that the efficacy of the vaccine is only 5 years, making it worthless by the time the subject needs the immunity, i.e. around her fiftieth birthday. Any claimed protection will have worn off long ago.
An established risk factor with cervical cancer is the number of sexual partners a woman has had during her life. So who do you imagine will have had more, a 12 year old girl, or a 50 year old woman? I would suggest that there is something seriously amiss with anyone who selects the former.
So why are they so intent on giving it to 12 year olds, rather than what would be the correct target age group, that is, if the vaccine did have any protective value; namely women in their late forties and fifties? Merck say it’s because the vaccine hasn’t been `safety proved` for women above 26 years of age.
So as Dr Tim O’Shea[1] sardonically puts it, "better give it to young girls then."
Real side effects in exchange for unproven immunity.
As can be seen in the case of Ashleigh Cave (above), the vicious debilitating and painful side affects to this vaccine programme are little short of frightening, and when weighed against the benefits, which appear to be zero; then surely it is time for parents to wake up, smell the horse manure, and join together against the State's draconian and inhuman treatment of its people, before a whole generation of British Girls are allowed to be sterilised or worse.
Treating Cancer, Or Dealing Cancer?
It appears that there is even a strong probability that this under tested and unproven drug might be carcogenic in it’s own right. We are dealing here with a vaccine which claims to prevent cancer by imitating a pathogen which causes cancer. Merck say about this:
“Gardasil has not been evaluated for carcogenicity or impairment to fertility.”
It is in the above statement that I believe the true motives behind this programme lie. To cause sterility and or cancer in young females thereby enabling a massive advance in the global depopulation agenda. It can be the only logical reason as to why governments now so obviously in the service of the `hidden masters` would either encourage, coerce or mandate such an unsubstantiated vaccination regime and apply it to 12 year old girls when the risk group if any, applies to women in their forties and fifties, who for the most part are well past the age of conception.
Furthermore, the Pharmaceuticals will once again make a fortune off the back of human suffering. What is so worrying is that with all the mainstream avenues of information secured, Governments bought and paid for, health professionals either cynically `on board` or woefully uninformed, and the seemingly limitless ability of the mass of the population to just comply, comply, comply, it is difficult to see how this exercise in evil can be thwarted.
It appears that in the UK at least, the State in its utter arrogance and disdain for its own populace, no longer considers it necessary to mask its Fascist Credentials. What is going on in that once proud land is a scandal and a disgrace, and I for one am both angry and frustrated that there seems so little that ordinary people can do to unseat the demagogic tyranny which now inhabits the `Mother Of All Parliaments;` not that the other lot would do it any better!
Comments To : The Righteous Alliance http://righteousalliance.blogspot.com/
and http://www.nylonmanden.dk/index.php?option=com_content&task=blogsection&id=7&Itemid=43
Ref:
1] Dr Tim O’Shea : HPV The First Cancer Vaccine www.rense.com 10.6.7
http://video.google.com/videosearch?q=gardasil&emb=0#
http://www.heising.dk `Pharmageddon The Global War Against Women` by Kjeld Heising.
Comments
And the story that HPV is the cause of cervical cancer is utter scientific baloney. As I explain in my book, here we have the ageold rift between Antoine Béchamp and Louis Pasteur: microbes have no business in a healthy and balanced body. HPV being present in the cervix says something about the immunological and nutritional state of the woman in question. But then again, we live in a society were the food that should keep us healthy, is perverted to a highly toxic state by the removal of important but perishable nutrients and the addition of unhealthy substances for the sake of how the product looks and tastes.
In all these aspects I see the three same old outcomes that the military medical pharmaceutical industrial complex seems to be after: to make people sick and handicapped, dumb and infertile. In that sense the HPV vaccines are doing a great job.
It seems we are in agreement. If you are of a mind to do so, please write to me here : true_brit58
and visit the `Righteous Alliance,` (Google it).
Thanks for youe informed response.
Philip
I wrote about this in my article "Women and Cancer" so if I may be so bold as to quote:
You are correct when you say that women over 50 are more likely to become infected with HPV vis a vis cervical cancer then young girls, as they are more likely to have numerous sex partners. However, in many places in various Western cultures, including Britian and the US, girls as young as 9 are engaging in sexual exploration and have few problems completing the full sex act.
Eva Peron, who married Juan Peron, the president of Argentina, started having sex at the age of 13, as she climbed over the "laps" of dozens of men in her frantic efforts to escape a background of illegitimacy and poverty. She died at 33, at the height of her fame, of cervical cancer. It has been documented by medical authorities that the frequency of sex, starting at a very young age, increases the likelihood of cancer 500 fold. Women who marry at 18+ and remain faithful with one partner, have almost zero chance of this disease. Breast cancer is more likely to strike these women then any cancers of the sexual organs. Therefore, the Illuminati encouragement of sexual experimentation, under the guise of the "sexual freedom of choice" is as likely to kill or disable women as is the poisonous Gardasil, or any other vaccine they will come up with.
As society continues to breakdown, and men and women seek endless "hook-ups" with each other, instead of love and its attendant stabilizers of marriage and family, the Illuminati's agenda of scouring the earth of 75% of its population will be easier and easier to implement, and probably no blood will be shed. We will give ourselves over to them, for their promise of dark satanic salvation will seem ever more enchanting then this execrable loneliness we have self-imposed upon ourselves.
Again, thank you Philip.