Who Rules The World? Part One.

The Origin Of Evil : Ancient Mythology Or Occult Reality?

By Philip Jones 1st July 2009.

9b24.jpg Many people would naively answer the above question by saying that Barrack Obama, the current `Glove Puppet` US President does. Others might proclaim that it is the UN which exercises global authority. Some of those involved in the same field of research as myself might say that the `Rothschild's and the Illuminati are the `Lords of this world.` Many Christians and Jews will say it is our creator, Yahweh, who should be rightfully regarded as such, for after all, he is `The Lord.` The faithful followers of Islam will pronounce that `Allah` is the almighty most merciful ruler over all creation.

Would you be surprised then to discover that nowhere does the Bible say that either Jesus Christ or his Heavenly Father are the real rulers of this world. On the contrary, the scriptures record Jesus as having said: "The ruler of this world will be cast out." And he added: "The ruler of the world is coming, and he has no hold on me."-John 12:31; 14:30; 16:11.

Discovering The Truth:

Those of you who do not consider the Holy Scriptures (or the Koran for that matter) as being the word of God, may be wondering where all of this is leading. But I ask you to bear with me. Contrary to what many who read my articles believe, I am not in any shape or form one who simply accepts all the Biblical accounts without question. Perhaps life might be easier if I did, but that's another story. Even two years ago, if not a confirmed Atheist, I was at the very least highly sceptical about all religion and like many these days raised in the Christian faith, of that belief system particularly.

However, over those two years, having read countless books and articles relating to the Illuminati and the `Global Conspiracy` to create a One World Dictatorship, time and again I have found myself resorting to the Holy Book for explanations, and it is therefore from that `book of ages,` along with the Book Of Enoch and the Holy Koran that I have taken reference from in the main.

The subject matter we are dealing with here is immense and beyond the scope of an article of this nature. However, I hope that what follows will excite the reader's interest sufficiently to prompt further investigation into this important and fascinating subject.

War And Peace:

Throughout world history, mankind has bled and suffered, and it increasingly continues to do so. David Lawrence, the `late` editorial writer asked, "Peace on earth'-nearly everybody wants it. 'Good will toward men'-almost all the peoples of the world feel it toward one another. Then what's wrong? Why is war threatened despite the innate desires of peoples?"

It is indeed perplexing that whilst the natural desire of most people is to live in peace, there are others who almost habitually seem to hate and kill one another-and with a viciousness seen nowhere else amongst those other creatures which share this planet with us. Consider the cold-blooded excesses in monstrous cruelty which man has perpetrated upon his fellow man during the last hundred years alone. Mankind has used gas chambers, concentration camps, flame-throwers, nuclear weapons, napalm bombs, and a multitude of other heinous means and methods to torture and slaughter one another most mercilessly.

I personally do not believe that human beings, who in the majority, long for peace and happiness, are capable in themselves of such gross wickedness. What force drives men to such loathsome deeds, or manoeuvres them into situations, where they feel compelled to commit such atrocities? Like many today involved in this area of investigation, it is my contention that there is lurking in the shadows, behind the scenes, some purely wicked, invisible power which is, through its agents and disciples, manipulating, coercing and influencing people to commit terrible acts of treachery, violence, perversion, and what can only be termed unadulterated evil. If one steps outside the `Matrix,` and considers the `bigger picture,` this pandemic evil can be seen as being anything but a collection of random unconnected incidents and occurrences. To the contrary, it appears to be a driven, systematic, controlled, and malevolent agenda, manipulating the course of world events towards a defined `end game.`

Most who understand believe that `end game` to be the `New World Order` and the establishment of a One World Dictatorship. But is there more to it all than just a collection of ego-maniacal men of fantastic wealth and resources who, drunk on power, seek total and complete dominion over the planet and all who live upon it? Is there a greater force, of even supernatural powers behind it all? Let's examine the facts!

The Ruler of the World Identified:

For Christians, there is no need to guess at who the ruler of this world is, for the Bible clearly tells us that an intelligent, hitherto unseen being, has been controlling both men and nations since the very dawn of humanity. It says: "The whole world is lying in the power of the wicked one." And the Bible identifies him, saying: "The one called Devil and Satan is misleading the entire inhabited earth."-1 John 5:19; Revelation 12:9.

On one occasion when Jesus was `tempted` by the Devil,` he did not question Satan's role as the ruler of this world. The Bible explains what happened: "The Devil took him along to an unusually high mountain, and showed him all the kingdoms of the world and their glory, and he said to him: 'All these things I will give you if you fall down and do an act of worship to me.' Then Jesus said to him: "Get thee hence, Satan: for it is written, thou shalt worship the Lord thy God, and him only shalt thou serve!"-Matthew 4:1, 8-10.

The Scriptures tell us then that Satan/Lucifer tempted Jesus by offering him "all the kingdoms of the world."  Would this offer have been any kind of temptation at all if Satan was not the actual ruler of these kingdoms? No, it would not, and note; Jesus did not deny that all these worldly governments were Satan's, which he would have done if Satan had not had power over them. So, then, Satan/Lucifer/the Devil really is the unseen ruler of the world! The Bible, in fact, calls him "The god of this system of things." (2 Corinthians 4:4)

In order to understand how this evil entity achieved his power over mankind, we need to carefully, and with an open mind, examine the Biblical account.

We are told in the book of Genesis that the one who became Satan had originally been an angel created by Yahweh God, but that he became envious and rebelled, challenging God's ascendency over all creation. Genesis then tells us that he used a serpent as a mouthpiece to deceive the first woman, Eve, and was thus able to get her and her husband, Adam, to do his bidding rather than obey God. (Genesis 3:1-6; 2 Corinthians 11:3) He also claimed he could turn all of Adam and Eve's yet unborn offspring away from God.

Significantly, Satan is not alone in his worldly dominion. He was successful in persuading some of the other angels to join him in rebellion against God. These are the Angels and `Sons of God` mentioned in the below verses:

"And the great dragon was cast out, that old `serpent,` called the Devil, and Satan, which deceiveth the whole world: He was cast out into the earth and his angels were cast out with him."Book Of Revelation 12:9

"And it came to pass, when men began to multiply on the face of the earth, and daughters were born unto them, That the sons of God saw the daughters of men that they were fair; and they took them wives of all which they chose. And the LORD said, My spirit shall not always strive with man, for that he also is flesh, yet his days shall be an hundred and twenty years. The Nephilim were upon the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bore children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown." Gen. 6:1-7.

The Bible speaks of these `Fallen Angels` when it urges Christians to: "Stand firm against the machinations of the Devil; because we have a wrestling, not against blood and flesh, but . . . against the world rulers of this darkness, against the wicked spirit forces in the heavenly places."-Ephesians 6:11, 12.

We can see from the above that we are actually dealing with two distinct and separate `falls,` a salient point we shall return to later.

Bene Haelohim: Sons Of God or Sons Of Seth?

The term `Sons of God,` or `Bene Haelohim,` has been debated for centuries as to whether it refers to the Angels of God, or the godly line of believers that descended down through Adam's son Seth. A further complication is that in the New Testament, the term is also used to identify men/women who have accepted Christ as their Saviour. But in the OT, it is used on five occasions and each time in reference to Angels. Four use the phrase, sons of the God, Bene Haelohim, and only one, Job 38:7, has it as sons of God, Bene Elohim, omitting the definite article:

Genesis 6:2, "That the sons of God, Bene Haelohim, saw the daughters of men."

Genesis 6:4,"When the sons of God, Bene Haelohim, came in unto the daughters of men."

Job 1:6, "Now there was a day when the sons of God, Bene Haelohim, came to present themselves

before the LORD."

Job 2:1, "Again there was a day when the sons of God, Bene Haelohim, came to present themselves before the LORD."

Job 38:7, "And all the sons of God, Bene Elohim, shouted for joy."

The interpretation of Genesis 6 which takes `The Sons of God` as referring to the line of Seth, conveniently `sidesteps` the obvious problem of how ethereal spirit creatures could copulate with humans. This thesis appeared very early on in such thinkers as Chrysostom and St. Augustine, and was later adopted by reformers such as Luther and Calvin.

But I believe that there are sound and objective reasons for rejecting this interpretation in favour of the angelic or supernatural view. As far as the Biblical use of the phrase `The Sons of God` (Bene Elohim) is concerned, as we can see in the above examples, in each case, it clearly means spirit beings; those fallen spirits who accompanied Satan in his periodic appearances before the Lord in heaven.

Another factor which lends veracity to the `Angel` interpretation of Genesis 6 is that this was the view of the translators of the Septuagint[3], who rendered `Sons of God` as meaning `Angels,` as did other Jewish writers in the pre-Christian era. But the key which unlocks the mystery is the Book of Enoch[4]. In relation to Genesis 6:1-7, Enoch writes:

"And it came to pass when the children of men had multiplied that in those days were born unto them beautiful and comely daughters. And the angels, the children of heaven, saw and lusted after them, and said to one another: 'Come, let us choose us wives from among the children of men and beget us children.'They were in all two hundred[They] took unto themselves wives, and each chose for himself one, and they began to go in unto them and to defile themselves with them, and they taught them charms and enchantments.... And they became pregnant, and they bare great giants[1], whose height was three thousand ells.... And there arose much godlessness, and they committed fornication, and they were led astray, and became corrupt in all their ways" (chs. 6-8).

The Biblical account of the `Fallen Angels` is strengthened and in many ways confirmed by the Sumerian legends of the Annunaki (Those Who From Heaven To Earth Came), not withstanding the rather eccentric accounts of those beings found in Zechariah Sitchin's Earth Chronicles. Ancient Mesopotamian Mythology attributes the creation of the Sumerian culture to the Gods, or `Anunnaki` whom it can be seen equate in many ways with the Biblical `Nephilim.` It is pertinent to our investigation that there are many parallels between the Old Testament tales and the myths of Sumer, Akkad, Assyria and Babylon, including the tale of the `Flood,` and that when `speaking` of the Annunaki, nowhere in the ancient scriptures of those cultures are the Fallen Ones or `Sons of Anu,` depicted as being anything other than Godly beings[2]. I suggest that until proved conclusively otherwise, we should give the Nephilim of the Biblical Account the same benefit of the doubt.

So, if we accept that that the `Son's Of God` in Genesis 6 were `Angels,` then it is logical to assume that the union between Angels and `the daughters of men` would produce the `mighty men` of antiquity? Since this verse specifically refers to the `heroes of old,` then it is probable that in this, we have the origin of those stories of half- human, half-divine figures present in virtually all ancient mythologies? The stories of Homer and other writers would have been embellished of course, but they probably reflect genuine memories of these ancient outstanding figures of the pre-Flood period.

When we put all this together we can justifiably conclude that the `Fallen Angels,` or Nephilim, were just that, and able to procreate with the women here on earth, and that this hybrid union created a race of giants that have been recorded in different countries as being easily eight feet tall, nine feet tall, eleven feet tall, eighteen feet, twenty three feet and larger![1]

Two Falls?

"And the great dragon was cast out, that old `serpent,` called the Devil, and Satan, which deceiveth the whole world: He was cast out into the earth and his angels were cast out with him."Book Of Revelation 12:9

In his detailed exegesis (Hebrew Union College 1939), scholar Julian Morgernstern shows not only that the `Sons Of God` were Angels incarnated, but that `tied up` in the Genesis verses are two distinct accounts of separate `falls.` Namely, that of Lucifer's rebellion against God in Eden, and his subsequent fall from pride, accompanied by a multitude of lesser angels, known as the Nephilim, and the other, that referred to in Genesis 6:1-7, more faithfully recorded in the book of Enoch (see page three above) the later fall of the angels also known as the `Watchers,`[5]who fell from grace through lust after the daughters of men.

This sheds new light on this passage: "The Nephilim were upon the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bore children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown."

By this, we can presume that there were Nephilim already present, when the `Sons Of God` or Watchers, fell through lust and that they remained there after that.

Revelation 12:9 teaches that the Nephilim became as `flesh` on earth, and is confirmed in its assertion by Genesis 6:4 which tells us that the same fate became the condition of the `Watchers.`

Before we move on, a misunderstanding needs clarifying, regarding the term `Nephilim.` The correct meaning of the term is `cast down ones` clearly referring to the `Sons Of God` or Fallen Angels and not their hybrid offspring, the Gibborim and Anakim.

In his book `The Days Of Noah,` which lends heavily from the Books Of Enoch, Jubilees and other Hebrew Apocrypha, Jeremy Knapp writes:

"Unlike Istehar, the pious maiden, Naamah, the lovely sister of Tubal-cain, led the angels astray with her beauty, and from her union with the watcher Shamdon, sprang the devil Asmodeus. She was as shameless as all the other descendants of Cain, and as prone to bestial indulgences. Cainite women and Cainite men alike were in the habit of walking abroad naked, and they gave themselves up to every conceivable manner of lewd practices. Of such were the women whose beauty and sensual charms tempted the angels from the path of virtue. The angels, on the other hand, no sooner had they rebelled against God and descended to Earth than they lost their transcendental qualities, and were invested with sublunary bodies, so that a union with the daughters of men became possible. The offspring of these alliances between the angels and the Cainite women were the giants, known for their strength and their sinfulness; as their very name, the Emim, indicates, they inspired fear. They have many other names. Sometimes they go by the name Rephaim, because one encounter with them makes one's heart grow weak; or by the name Gibborim, simply giants, because their size was so enormous that their thigh measured nearly two ells; or by the name Zamzummim, because they were great masters in war; or by the name Anakim, because they touched the sun with their neck; or by the name Ivvim, because, like the snake, they could judge of the qualities of the soil; or finally, by the name Nephilim, because, bringing the world to its fall, they themselves fell." The Days Of Noah by Jeremy Knapp[6]

We will now turn to that other aspect of the `unholy alliance;` the line of Cain, mentioned in the verse above, with whom it is said the Nephilim copulated, and which, according to occult mythology, produced the Satanic Seed-line of the Illuminati?

Return To Eden:

Before we get to the `meat` of this section, the reader should be aware that this hypothesis is based on my own research and study, along with that of several others, including in part, the late Pastor Bertrand L. Comparet; A man whose racial prejudices I do not share, but whose examination of the Book of Genesis, where it relates to the events in the Garden of Eden, and the subsequent life of Cain, I find at the very least plausible, and which offers `workable` answers to questions, where other's simply don't.

So, to continue:

It is generally believed that the Bible teaches that Adam and Eve were the first humans, but a closer look at Genesis 1:26-28 reveals something quite different. If we read these verses carefully, we discover that God had already created man and woman prior to Adam and Eve:

26"And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth.27 So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.28 And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it: and have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth." Genesis 1:26-28 KJV.

Later in Chapter 2: 7 we read: "And the LORD God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul.8 And the LORD God planted a garden eastward in Eden; and there he put the man whom he had formed.8"

And further in Chapter 2:21 "And the LORD God caused a deep sleep to fall upon Adam, and he slept; and he took one of his ribs, and closed up the flesh instead thereof.22 And the rib, which the LORD God had taken from man, made he a woman, and brought her unto the man."

So at the time Yahweh created Adam and Eve, we can fairly infer that there were already other humans upon the earth. Then in Genesis 3:1-6 we read: "1 Now the serpent was more subtle than any beast of the field which the LORD God had made. And he said unto the woman, Yea, hath God said, Ye shall not eat of every tree of the garden? 2 And the woman said unto the serpent, We may eat of the fruit of the trees of the garden: 3 but of the fruit of the tree which is in the midst of the garden, God hath said, Ye shall not eat of it, neither shall ye touch it, lest ye die. 4 And the serpent said unto the woman, Ye shall not surely die: 5 for God doth know that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as gods, knowing good and evil."

So, how many reading this believe that the entity that deceived Eve was a literal Serpent or Snake? When the Old Testament was translated, the word `Serpent `was converted from the Hebrew `Nachash,` which means enchanter or magician. I concur with Pastor Comparet when he suggests that we are dealing with a `Fallen Angel,` namely Lucifer, though now corporeal, who still retained some if not all of his Angelic powers, and could no doubt appear both enchanting and seductive to a hitherto pure and naïve girl like Eve.

The `translators` of the King James Version of the Bible, also mistranslated the Hebrew word `Pirchach,` meaning progeny, brood, children or descendants into `fruit.` But surely, what the original text was referring to was the `fruit of loins,` or the descendants of the human family `tree,` which was in the middle of the symbolic garden. Yahweh was implicit: "Ye shall not eat of it, neither shall ye touch it." That word `touch` is in the original Hebrew `Naga,` which is a polite way of saying to have sexual intercourse with.

Yahweh did not want either Adam or Eve to mix with the other humans. Satan had corrupted and contaminated those created before Adam, and so Yahweh was determined that Satan's poisonous evil would not do likewise to his pure and yet uncorrupted creation.

In Genesis 3:13, Yahweh has summoned Adam, Eve and Satan before him to give account for their misdeeds. The King James Bible records Eve as saying, "The serpent beguiled me, and I did eat thereof." Again we have the Hebrew word `Nachash,` meaning enchanter. Then there is the use of the word beguiled; the Hebrew word there is `Nawshaw,` which means SEDUCED. The English word `beguiled` means to influence by trickery, flattery and also implies deception or delusion by a form of stealth. The word `Nawshaw` means SEDUCED. No honest translator can come up with the word `beguiled` from `Nawshaw.` (even the Google translator gets it right). So with the correct wording, the verse should read "And Yahweh God said unto the woman, what is this thou hast done? And the woman said, the enchanter seduced me."

So Lucifer/Satan, call him what you will, seduced Eve. He `Knew` her in the Biblical sense.

In Genesis 3:15 Yahweh says to Satan, "I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and between thy seed and her seed." Pastor Comparet's research into the Hebrew language and subsequent conclusions show clearly that the same word `Zehra` was used for both the seed of Satan and the seed of Eve. Zehra literally means seed, and is used consistently throughout the Bible to denote the descendants of a person.

So now we come to it; Satan in this `coupling` was to have his own literal progeny in this world, on this earth, in this dimension, in the same way as was Eve with her husband Adam.

Some days ago, I was visited by the Jehovah's Witnesses. Now rather than be rude and just usher them away, I mentioned the hypothesis I am presenting here to them, and waited for their response. And predictably, as Pastor Comparet suggested detractors might, they parroted this verse: "And Adam knew his wife, and she conceived and bare Cain."

But was this cause and effect? Nowhere in the Bible does it say `Adam begat Cain.` Throughout the Old Testament, lineages are recorded in very specific terms, such as this person begat that person and so on. Those responsible for remembering and reciting the lore of tribes and nations took their job very seriously. Bloodline meant that one either belonged or didn't. So how do we explain this?

Eve, having been wholly seduced by Satan (Genesis 3:13, II Corinthians 11:3, I Timothy 2:14) having tasted of the `fruit,` then offers `it` to Adam who partakes of his now defiled wife (Genesis 3:12). Eve conceives twice. The two `seeds` produce Cain and then Abel (Genesis 4:1-2). The Bible tells us that Eve was the mother of mankind (Genesis 3:20) but Adam was NOT the father of Cain, Satan was. Thus, two separate lineages were established, one the seed of man and the other the seed of Satan the deceiver and adversary[7].

So returning to Adam's genealogy; we can now explain and conclude that Abel's omission is likely due to the fact that he was killed by his brother Cain, before he left any descendants of his own. But lack of posterity cannot account for Cain's absence in Adam's lineage, as the Bible traces his line for six generations unbroken. Not once is Cain recorded as being a descendant of Adam. In fact, the only child attributed to Adam is Seth in Genesis 5:3: "And Adam lived 130 years, and begat a son in his own likeness, after his image; and called his name Seth."

The Satanic Bloodline:

So, if the Satanic Bloodline crept in through Cain, and possibly even earlier, among the pre Adamic people (Genesis 1:26-28) it is plausible that some of the descendants of Adam were also infected through marriage with the Cainites. Furthermore, by the very fact that those living around Noah were wiped out by the flood, it appears evident that they did mix their bloodline. In his book, `The Days Of Noah` Jeremy Knapp writes:

"Unfortunately, at the time of Methuselah, following the death of Adam, the family of Seth became corrupted after the manner of the Cainites. The two strains united with each other to execute all kinds of iniquitous deeds. The result of the marriages between them were Godless and many, whose sins hurried the deluge upon the world. In their arrogance they claimed the same pedigree as the posterity of Seth, and they compared themselves with princes and men of noble descent."

Yahweh's intention was to take back the world from Satan's dominion, and he was going to rule it according to his purpose. He was going to rule it through through the descendants of Adam. The obvious counter to this move on Satan's part would be to mix in his own line with that of the descendants of Adam, and then he could haughtily claim: "These are all my children. All have my blood in them."

This it appears is exactly what Satan set out to do, and considering the carnage witnessed down through the ages, and current torrid world events in particular, one could be forgiven for regarding his mission a resounding success; To date at least!

But there is a problem with all of this; The Flood! The Bible appears adamant that only Noah and his family survived?

In the second of this two part series, we will attempt to establish whether the Satanic Bloodline survived the Great Flood, and if so how. We will discover who and what the Illuminati is, and how they connect with that great and awful evil force which appears to permeate our sad planet these days.


David Livingstone :

David Livingstone : The Dying God http://www.thedyinggod.com/

The Holy Bible & The Holy Koran.

Pastor Mike : The Nephilim

Elizabeth Claire Prophet : Fallen Angels.


2] http://www.scribd.com/doc/13789608/Myths-of-Babylonia-Assyria-Donald-a-Mackenzie

3] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Septuagint

4] The Book Of Enoch : http://www.hermetics.org/pdf/enoch.pdf

5] http://www.deliriumsrealm.com/delirium/articleview.asp?Post=186

6] Jeremy Knapp : The Days Of Noah.

7] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superfecundation


0 #1 Doug Carney 2009-07-05 01:19
Had to send a quick note. This is really good - I'm looking forward to part 2. Again, one of the main reasons it is effective, is that it is succinct. You give enough info, and don't allow the point to get lost in details. That's hard to do - must require a lot of revising?

In the article you mention your disillusionment and mistrust of christian teachings from before, and how you found yourself going to the Bible for research.
Sometime you might want to write an article about how the churches have become success and money oriented, watered down God's word, and started teaching the words of man rather than the laws of God.
If you ever do, please don't fail to slam the oxymoron, "judeo-christianity."
0 #2 Tony Teen 2009-07-05 01:35

ok so there were the first group of men created and unfortunately they were corrupted by statan..so there were these humans and children of satan as well as satan running around :-)) . Therefore god created "new man" so the question is why put this new man in the dangers of satan once again??..I mean god warned "new man" about satan don't go near the tree, but the devil seduced eve just the same!!

Take care.

0 #3 Tony 2009-07-05 01:36
Dear Philip,

I like this article very much....

so lets not only run with the two seeds concept but also with the two creation timelines concept.. you have the group of beings created in timeline 1 ( angelic/ demonic) and you have the beings create in timeline 2 ( much more human).. what I beleive I can ascertain from a bit of reasoning here is that the angelic/demonic beings created in the first round are NOT all spirit but much much much similar to the creatures that god created the second time around. Of course the second time around he createed a much better being. I'm thinking of this much as like when an object is created in the production line.. look at a car made 100 years ago and look at one made today.. I mean they both function and get the job done.. the one that was made 100 years ago has in it the very essence of the people who created the car..it has the bare essentials to function therefore it is much much more reflecting the essence of the creator. I beleive that it was a similar issue regarding the creation..

Therefore much as you are saying i beleive that the timeline 1 beings, satan the beings symbolized by the tree etc are yes much closer to the creator but I beleive that they were of flesh and blood just as the rest of the beings created in timeline 2, jut that the timeline 1 beings had a wider reflection of the creator withinn them...well just my 2 cents..

0 #4 Bill 2009-07-05 01:37
Hi Philip:
Hope all is well. Been quite busy and not able to keep up with everything, so not as communicative as would like.
Anyway, excellent first part. You make the very insightful perceptions seem to be the only obvious conclusions. Could not disagree with anything.
Really looking forward to the second part.
Please plan to gather all your writings into a book and either publish or have it published.
You should be able to put the remunerations to many worthy endeavors.
0 #5 Kevin Stocks 2009-07-05 01:39
Hello Phil,

I read everything that you write these days. You know what you're talking about and that is what matters. It seems after this week and the legislation that has been passed in The USA, we have an up hill struggle Phil? Cap and trade bill I am talking about mate! Just another illuminate wealth trasferal scheme for them... It is getting to be really crazy out there now mate that's for sure.

Now you take good care mate

My best as always

0 #6 John 9:39 2009-07-05 01:51
Dear Phil,

Amen and Amen, you truly walk in the light of God, even if you don´t see it yourself you are a true believer.You are a real defender of The Truth. John 8:32

The biggest lie that the devil is selling the world is that he doesn't exist
The Devil needs to get you to believe that the bible is unproven, that Jesus is just a story. But you and me know now that the Lord Jesus Christ is real and Powerful.

The word of God is our weapon, that is what they fear most

I am looking forward to part 2
0 #7 Peter 2009-07-05 01:52
I found especially the start of the article very good

It is al so logical, i mean which human being wants to be part of war, destruction or genocide or other atrocities. The most people just want to live their lives in love and peace and take care of their family and children

There must be an evil force what seduces mankind.
I have thought this for many years, the first time was when the war in Bosnia started, the enormous evil we saw there

I always thought there were 2 kinds of people
1. People like us, loving people who loves Gods creation
2. People who can shoot a 3 year old boy in the face(bosnia), man who have rejected God
0 #8 David Burton 2009-07-05 11:07
I also read your latest Who Rules the World Part 1 on Rense and am looking forward to your next section of that. Well done.
0 #9 VDO Bill 2009-07-05 19:11
Was thinking recently in connection with your excellent article that a parasitic, satanic/demonic, individual soul possession is the short term objective of satan's dominion of earth's sentients including animals. Remember Christ casting the devils from the swine. Wanting an army of possessed robotic souls to fight the returning Saviour, combined with being trapped in earth DUMB's, has satan in a mad scramble to complete his plans asap.
Anyway, thanks for your stellar article and am looking forward to the next.
0 #10 Jonee Tiedemann 2009-07-05 22:44

greetings from the tranquil lands of Patagonia. I have just read your latest article on rense.com and decided to write to you. Your email is hard to find, by the way, surely intended, and not at all a bad idea.

To the point, I just want to contribute with some material to your quest of piecing the puzzle together. Namely this: there is evidence beyond the many scriptures for the involvement of non-humans in the history of man. This evidence is extremely strong in that it does not depend on accounts written down, translated and edited later by other humans. I mean physical evidence, which, though suppressed, does exist.

The particular evidence that I am referring to, and I will limit it to this for now, are non-human skulls, called dolichocephalus heads, which someone called coneheads, which is a lot easier to pronounce. These skulls are exhibited in some South American museums, and perhaps many of them are tucked away safely to not raise concerns. In my research, I have found that anomalous findings in archeology are invariably accompanied by the suppression of evidence, ridiculing of scholars and "explanations" that even 10-year olds can dismiss. One of them is that the cranial shape was accomplished by regular humans with the widely technique of infant head binding, resulting in flattened or elongated skull shapes. This does not explain a cranial volume of up to 3,000 cubic cm, because as you and I know, changing the shape does not increase the volume.

Regular humans certainly could have been inspired by their fellow dolichos/coneheads to shape their heads by head binding, which is observed not only in SA races but elsewhere on the planet.

I am in the process of fitting pieces together and thought that you might welcome this info. It is not widely available, and the person who wrote the article from which these photos were lifted obtained some of the photos from friends who travel S America and visited some of the museums.�

Let me sum up: the evidence is there to be scrutinized, but don't expect it to come from the Smithsonian or the like. Private individuals with a healthy common sense and an open mind are really the players who matter in this endeavour to cut through the haze of childish disinfo.�

As someone said to one of these inquisitive minds:�

"No matter how conclusive the evidence, we have the power to minimize and suppress it."�


"Why are these dates considered "anomalous"? Because they are marginal in terms of the currently-accepted evolutionary paradigm.� This is due to the fact that the assumption of the progressive evolution of humans from the great ape family guides the acceptance and rejection of the evidence for evolution itself. In the study of logic, this is known as a tautology. You start with a theory, and only facts which support this theory are considered. So everything inside of this neat little box�is TRUE because no contradictory facts are allowed to enter the box."


"Theory determines how evidence is treated." �

Best regards,

Jonee Tiedemann
0 #11 Luke Villiers 2009-07-06 00:41
hello mr jones.

I just wanted to tell you that I really enjoyed your article....part 1

I don't have any real comments yet, but I really enjoyed the article.

I am looking forward to part 2....thanks.

thanks for the info.

0 #12 Jean Bush 2009-07-06 12:17
I think, Philip, that this will be your masterpiece.

You have made it icily clear, but this is now, and will be, hotly debated for a long time to come. And while people are talking, evil is stalking, hiding behind igorance, blindness and disbelief.

Many now think they know exactly what's coming at us. A group of interbred, rich and powerful families that want to usher in a NWO and control the world.

These people seem to think that if they can destroy the structure of this NWO it will be defeated. Nothing can be further from the truth. And that is why we need you.

Others believe that a spiritual battle is at hand and think that by recognizing evil, they are well equipped to fight it. They are certain of the how, why, what and when of it. But unless they know the who if it, they will fail utterly.

Believing oneself to be on the side of God is a worthy thing, however, many become self-righteous, thinking that a mere belief in Him is all that it takes, and they become arrogant in the certainty of their of their rightness.

In Luke 10:19-20 Christ admonishes all:

Behold, I give you the power to tread on serpents and scorpions, and over all the power of the enemy: and nothing shall by any means hurt you.
Notwithstanding in this rejoice not, that the spirits are subject unto you; but rather rejoice, because your names are written in heaven. (KJV)

It seems that to be proud of recognizing evil, and in one's ability to fight it, means to disarm one's self of the very weapons needed in this battle: love, oneness and faith in God. Being for God is not the same as being of Him.

Dismantling and destroying the coming NWO and all its attendant evils, will do nothing to save us, as the breeding, inbreeding and perpetuation of the Satanic bloodseed will continue until the decendants rise up again in their constant struggle to win all away from God. It is the origin, the source of this that must be defeated and vanquished.

There have been many new age prophets speaking of this. And most of them say that God speaks only to them. Does He? I think not. He speaks to all of us if we would just listen.

The following passage refers to the Sibyl who prophesied the fate of the Roman empire. Below are two translations (by James Rhoades and by C. S. Calverley).

Now the last age by Cumae's Sibyl sung
Has come and gone, and the majestic roll
Of circling centuries begins anew:
Justice returns, returns old Saturn's reign,
With a new breed of men sent down from heaven.
Only do thou, at the boy's birth in whom
The iron shall cease, the golden age arise. . .

Under thy guidance, whatso tracks remain
Of our old wickedness, once done away
Shall free the earth from never-ceasing fear.
He shall receive the life of gods, and see
Heroes with gods commingling, and himself
Be seen of them, and with his father's worth
Reign o'er a world at peace.

Come are those last days that the Sybil sang:
The ages' mighty march begins anew.
Now come the virgin, Saturn reigns again:
Now from high heaven descends a wondrous race.
Thou on the newborn babe – who first shall end
That age of iron, bid a golden dawn. . .

Thou, trampling out what prints our crimes have left,
Shalt free the nations from perpetual fear.
While he to bliss shall waken; with the Blest
See the Brave mingling, and be seen of them,
Ruling that world o'er which his father's arm shed peace.

Sounds as if Satan had his own prophet. Do you think?
0 #13 David Burton 2009-07-09 08:16

You asked me off-line by e-mail whether I had read this and yes, as it turns out I did one of these late nights and it was precisely this piece, among many of your honestly inspired pieces, which convinced me that you were probably onto something.

A passage which has often disturbed me because it runs so counter to prevailing ideas – one of which is the idea of “unconditional” love, which frankly, for another time, never has and never can exist – is the idea that some souls are potentially good (wheat) while others are ostensibly wicked (tares). This comes from Jesus’ parable in Matthew 13. Of specific interest is what He says in verses 36-43. You can tell that Jesus’ disciples were curious about the meaning of this distinctive parable and what He tells them is at complete variance with everything the world system would have us believe today about such things as the universal brotherhood of man and all people are potentially good and evil is merely an illusion, etc. etc. It ain’t so!
Increasingly I see that the veils and scales will fall from people’s eyes and they will see that some are dedicated to serving God while others are the Devil’s children. Note who the harvesters are. Who and what are angels? This one has always been a mystery and of interest to me. I have had my own experiences too which cannot be explained by normal means. Actually more people have than could care to admit too.

Looking forward to your next post regarding this.
0 #14 leslie schwartz 2009-07-10 03:42

Two very good articles on this topic.

But I think you are making it overly complex in particular by taking the Hebrew Bible narratives too literally. The bible IS a derivative document, and a creation with a purpose, that of indoctrination, to create a "people" out of Abraham's extended entourage, which incubated in Egypt ... to further the causes of the Nibiruian noble class on earth.

Further, I believe Sumerian scholars like Sitchen put the Deluge at roughly circa 10,000 to 11,000 BC.

I believe the seeds of the illuminati are the Annanaki underclass of workers and watchers who could not return to Nibiru, who ALSO interbred with the "Adamu" offspring. Among their offspring were the Nephilium, whom the Nibiruian nobility (and their human - Annanaki offspring) wanted to wipe out, hence the mission given to Abram, to take over Canaan, and wipe out the inhabitants - all of them.

These mass movements and tribulations on earth are to a large extent the continuation of the class and ethnic struggles of our small "g" god creators, the Nibiruians, who the Sumerians called the Annunaki.
0 #15 Michael Handels 2009-07-10 04:46
"The `translators` of the King James Version of the Bible, also mistranslated the Hebrew word `Pirchach,` meaning progeny, brood, children or descendants into `fruit."

It appears that, according to Strongst the word for "fruit" in Gen.3 is NOT Pirchach, but Per-ee, according to Strongs....Per-ee, From H6509; fruit (literally or figuratively): - bough, ([first-]) fruit ([-ful]), reward.

If Strongs is correct, then the hypothesis for Fruit in the Garden of Eden meaning progeny or offspring is NOT true...

comments anyone?
0 #16 MerLynn 2009-07-10 04:49
Well I agree Philip Jones...
But the story and the picture is far bigger. Think outside the sphere we call earth.

Until you have read (Google it)

Based On Personal Notes and Interview Transcriptions Provided by :
Matilda O'Donnell MacElroy

and learn how the transistor was reversed engineered from Roswell, can you begin to understand who rules this planet.

email me at
0 #17 MerLynn 2009-07-10 04:56
There are 2 kinds of souls (spirits or people)

1. those who are service to others.
2. those who are service to self.

By this criteria alone can one determine who one associates with. They dare not teach this in the politically incorrect inequality based education system known collectively as media/schools or they lose control.
0 #18 Deltager 2009-07-10 06:05
A series of books, written by Zecharia Sitchin, beginning with his "The 12th Planet" will be beneficial reading for all who want a very clear rendering of pre-biblical 'history'.

Sitchin's books have been translated into many languages. He paints a very clear picture of cosmological as well as terrestrial 'history'.

Sumer (the first true civilized city/state) comes alive in Sitchin's writings as does the subsequent city/states of Akkadia and Babylonia, especially in The 12th Planet.

His books are well worth reading if only for ancient Sumer's cuneiform texts dealing with our Solar System's 'creation' and subsequent history.

For a synopsis of his 'The 12th Planet' et al, you are invited to read my "Impression of the Earth Chronicles" written many years ago (before the internet became popular). Go to:

0 #19 Kevin Stocks 2009-07-10 11:31
In your article on 'Who rules the world,' you write:

"the world is in the power of the wicked one!"

I look forward to the next installment. It was true what you said....
0 #20 Philip Jones 2009-07-10 23:56
Re: Zechariah Sitchin.

The man is a Freemason and Illuminati to the bone. Do not be mislead by him. His bookd are little more than Science Fiction.

On a more positive note. Absolutely excellent comments from all.
0 #21 Leslie 2009-07-12 11:21
> You are clearly entirely misinformed re: Sitchen, his books, and the
> scholarship on which his views and the views of similar others are based.
> If you really think Sitchen is "a masonic - illuminati" then you owe it to
> people who have taken the time to read your writing why you believe this,
> since Sitchen and those who take his scholarship seriously, as I do, are
> day by day becoming more influential.
>>From my perspective, in this exploration, you got severly lost in the
>>minutia of the old testament (a creative fiction, written for the purpose
>>of indoctrination) in your search for the origins of the illuminati.
> Although, as I commented, I believe your articles were otherwise worth
> reading.
> Thanks,
0 #22 Philip Jones 2009-07-12 11:23
Dear Leslie,

I have read all of his books. All of them. I have them here at home, and they are fun filled indeed.

He appears to be a Freemason and very connected with the illuminati. He was recently captured on film with another one of them, Jordan Maxwell giving an easily recognisable Masonic Hand Shake.

See this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K6Plygo3UKM

And there's much more evidence. See Jennifer Green's' Testimony regarding here abuse by Sitchin and others at a Satanic Ritual.

The man took Erich Von Daniken's 1960's ideas then adapted them to the ancient Sumerian and Mesopotamian Legends.

You should be careful who you make a `Guru` for yourself. Just read the many online resources for Mesopotamian Mythology, and there compare it with Sitchen's eccentric ravings.


0 #23 Philip Jones 2009-07-12 11:32

For further confirmation from an internationally acclaimed author, contact David Livingstone who wrote the seminal `Terrorism & The Illuminati:`


Contact here: http://www.terrorism-illuminati.com/contact/

and ask his opinion of Sitchin.

I wasted a whole year of research on the man's supposed translations.

I am not a Bible scholar, nor am I a die hard Christian as I explain in my articles. I am an amateur researcher who goes where the evidence leads.

After buying all his books, and taking in his `rocket ship` theories, do you believe it was fun to discover he had an agenda?

I do not understand how you can say I got lost in Old Testament explanations. I use the Quran and Sumerian texts as a corroboration.

Furthermore, notwithstanding the obvious interference over the centuries, by those wishing to obscure the Biblical message, using all the means at their disposal, including malevolent and willfull ommissions, additions, and mistransalations, the Bible still stands as a fanatstic resource and historical document, not to metions being spiritually inspiring.

Sitchem's books are thrilling indeed, and there is some truth in there, but he has I believe willfully sensationalised the Mesopoptamian myths, to an end which only he and his like know. For me, it is just another knock at the only thing standing between humanity and bestiality; namely, the word of God, and it's moral teaching. Just witness the carnage around you. Is that going to be corrected by Sitchin's `revelations.`

I don't think so! Furthermore, these people can't even agree among themselves. Icke takes some of Sitchin's ideas, but not others which don't conform to his own theories, the same with Tsarion and all the rest.

Ehat do these people have in common? They all denounce Christianity, and fail to espouse morality.

Anyhow, thanks for writing, and for visiting the site. And do contact David Livingstone. He is very knowledgeable and will furnish you with a definitive answer to the question of Sitchin.


0 #24 Michael Handels 2009-07-12 22:54
Hello Philip.

As I commented earlier, the Hebrew word for fruit in Genesis 3 is NOT "Pirchach", as you are claiming, but is "Per-ee", which does actually mean fruit.

I DO find your hypothesis of the "origin" of evil interesting, but when you simply pick a word out of the blue, ie. claiming Pirchach as the Hebrew for fruit (in Genesis 3) when it is NOT the word actually used, that I have to seriously question your "motives/ethics".

Please explain where you get the use of Pirchach for fruit in Genesis 3.

Does anyone "here" actually CARE that the true Hebrew word used in Genesis 3 DOES mean fruit?

BTW....the fruit was NOT an apple! If not an apple, then what "fruit" would/could it be? Anybody?

0 #25 Philip Jones 2009-07-14 01:07
Lucifers children, and I do mean children not just followers, through the centuries used a serpent as a symbol or emblem of their ancestor, until they attached a secondary meaning of serpent to the word Nachash. In Genesis 3:1-3 Satan said to Eve, "Is it really true that Yahweh said, You can't eat of any tree in the garden?" As it reads in the Hebrew, Eve replied to Satan,"And the woman said unto the enchanter, We may eat of the fruit of the trees of the garden." Now I am going to switch to the King James translation and I will correct it as I go.

"Of the fruit of the tree which is in the midst of the garden, God has said, Ye shall not eat of it, neither shall ye touch it, lest ye die." Let's see what it actually said in the Hebrew. Fruit is the Hebrew word Pirchach, meaning progeny, brood, children or descendants. Do you talk about the children of a walnut tree or an apple tree? Of course you don't!

Of the Pirchach, of the descendants of the tree, which is in the midst of the garden, Yahweh has said, "Ye shall not eat of it, neither shall ye touch it". That word touch is the Hebrew word Naga, which is a more polite expression meaning, to have sexual intercourse with. Do you need to be warned not to have sexual intercourse with an apple? Of course not, it isn't that kind of a tree.

The Hebrew word `Pirchach means `fruit` as in progeny etc. It is used exclusively in the Hebrew Bible. Check this link at Strong's Hebrew to English dictionary:


Now I think you owe me an apology my friend and a public one at that. You will find me quite meticulous in my research. 21 years as a Police Officer taught me that lesson well.

I have to restrain myself from insulting your intellect here. The whole concept of the `fruit` of the tree is vital to the plot. The `fruit` is not an apple, but the fruit of loins.

Read my article again and refrain from rudeness and arrogance. It will get you nowhere.
0 #26 Deltager 2009-07-17 02:24
Hello Philip,

I have read a similar theory in Eustace Mullins' "The Curse of Canaan," and you have presented here in a clearer and certainly more convincing format.

Out of curiosity, have you come to any conclusions about the footprints pre-Adamic man may have left? i.e. Atlantis?

Add comment

Security code